Novelist Patricia Abbott, whose debut novel Concrete Angel is a nominee for the 2016 Macavity Award for Best First Mystery, discusses some of the thorny issues facing writers of crime fiction.
The Difficult Centerpiece of SHOT IN
DETROIT
SHOT INDETROIT is the story a female photographer desperate to find artistic success.
Through her relationship with a mortician, she comes up with the idea of photographing
young black men who have died in Detroit over a six-month period. I wrote the
character of Violet Hart as ambitious, a loner, a pest in getting what she
wants. An artist in other words. She lives on the outskirts of conventional
society--at least in her mind--reasoning that an artist is given license to
bend societal norms. Or is she? Does Violet exploit the men she photographs or
does she honor them? Is it somewhere in between? These are the issues I
wrestled with in writing SHOT IN DETROIT. Both in creating a character who
thought like this and in making her the book's centerpiece. And was I guilty of
the same transgressions?
I set SHOT
IN DETROIT almost totally within Detroit. It's a city often accused of
exemplifying transgression: the murder capital of the world plunged into
bankruptcy, suffering the lowest rate of high school graduation in the country,
imprisoning the most black males, enduring the most extreme poverty. The art
and literature coming out of Detroit was edgy, bleak, transgressive. How could it not be? To find a Detroit prompting a
different story, I'd have to have set it much earlier. Even in Joyce Carol
Oates' brilliant THEM, set in the fifties and sixties in Detroit, the plunge is
well underway.
Early
readers of SHOT found Violet a difficult sell. An agent gave me this advice:
change her name, make her younger, give her girlfriends, find her a best friend
who isn't a gay Filipino who sells drugs. Make her more appealing to women:
they buy the books. I took some of his advice. But each time I stepped farther
away from the Violet in my head, the story felt off-beam. If the central
premise of the novel was going to work, Violet could not be the sort of woman
who sat on PTA boards or lunched with former sorority sisters.
To be true
to my locale and subject, I needed to write Violet as somewhat promiscuous,
somewhat exploitative of her subjects, not adverse to the occasional indulgence
in illegal substances, not overly interested in cultivating female friendships.
Does this make her unlikeable? Not to me. Her back story will explain some of
this. Her devotion to her art explains more.
If Violet is
at first is cavalier about her project, time whittles away at her conviction.
Does the art she's making let her off the hook? She initially thinks so. But the
accretion of dead men makes her more aware of what's happening around her. A
project such as this can't be only about art. And the faces she repeatedly views
in extreme close-up haunt her, silently accusing her of exploiting them. Her
work also poisons her relationship with Bill, the mortician allowing her access
to the bodies. She pays a high price for her folly, for her art.
Every
question Violet asks herself in the book, I asked myself too. Were we both exploiting
the deaths in Detroit? A loner by nature, Violet inhabits a small world. Initially
I prepared biographies of the men who died in the novel. They were fictitious
characters but closely resembled men who died between 2008-2010. You only have
to google the words SHOT IN DETROIT and you will find horrifying stories like
"Two Shot in Argument Over Kool-Ade." I eventually omitted the back stories, using
only brief headlines in most cases. Like Violet, I had limits
Is Violet
too unlikable as a protagonist ? Not if fiction can concern characters and
situations that exist outside societal norms. In Violet's case, her work is not
an overt act of rebellion. It's not to satisfy some sexual or amoral impulse. She
sees beauty in her subjects, even dead ones. She believes them worthy of being
considered art. Whether this is enough to exonerate her from charges of
unlikability I don't know. But is being likable necessary in a fictional
character?
No comments:
Post a Comment